Applies for further time to file replies to an unsubmitted affidavit. Grants two weeks for respondent to file reply, four weeks for appellant to file rejoinders, and allows filing of written synopses. Lists matter for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-4721/PTN/2018 (U.H.) | |
|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-4722/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018 |
|
| Gajendra Narayan | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-4747/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4748/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 |
|
| Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr. | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-4758/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4759/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018 |
|
| Gudiya Devi | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… Respondent |
| & | |
| 4. MP-PMLA-4764/PTN/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-4765/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018 |
|
| Smt. Rajanti Devi @ Rajanti Kumari | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives wh | o appeared |
| For the Appellants : Mr. |
S.K. Pandey, Adv. |
| Mr. | Awanish Kumar, Adv. |
| For the Respondent : Mr. |
Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018
Page 1 of 2
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 07.02.2020
FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018
Ld. counsels for both the parties are present. Reply is not on record. Number of opportunities have already been given to the respondent to file the replies, even on the last date six weeks time was granted to the respondent but no replies forthcoming.
At the request of the ld. counsel for the respondent two weeks further time is granted to the respondent to file the replies with an advance copy to the other side as last opportunity. If no reply is filed by the respondent within time given above, the right to the replies would be deemed to be closed. In the event, reply has been filed by the respondent, appellant is granted four weeks time to file the rejoinders from the date of receipt of copy of the reply with an advance copy to the other side.
Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 18th August, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 7th February, 2020
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018
Page 2 of 2
Gajendra Narayan
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr.
Gudiya Devi
Smt. Rajanti Devi @ Rajanti Kumari
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
