FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 of Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP1 Jul 2019FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single bench granted the respondent two weeks to comply with an earlier order. The court drew an adverse inference against non-compliance. A notice for contempt was scheduled, with the respondent required to reply within four weeks and the appellant instructed to appear next if non-compliance continues.

What the court decided

AI extract

FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 of Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna — ATFP (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1.	MP-PMLA-4722/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018
	Gajendra Narayan	… Appellant/Applicant
	Versus
	The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
2.	MP-PMLA-4748/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018
	Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr.	… Appellants/Applicants
	Versus
	The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
3.	MP-PMLA-4759/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2453/PTN/2018
	Gudiya Devi	… Appellant/Applicant
	Versus
	The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
	&
4.	MP-PMLA-6164/PTN/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4765/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018
	Smt. Rajanti Devi @ Rajanti Kumari	… Appellant/Applicant
	Versus
	The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna	… Respondent
Adv	ocates/Authorized Representatives	who appeared
For t	he Appellants :	Mr. Awanish Kumar, Advocate
For t	he Respondent :	Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate
COR	AM
JUST	ICE MANMOHAN SINGH :	CHAIRMAN
FPA-PM	LA-2439/PTN/2018,
FPA-PM & FPA-P	LA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 MLA-2456/PTN/2018	Page 1 of 2

Page 1 of 2

ORDER

01.07.2019

FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018, FPAPMLA-2456/PTN/2018 & MP-PMLA-6164/PTN/2019 (Misc.)

¶7

Fresh application has been filed for initiating the contempt proceedings against the respondent as the order dated 11^th January, 2019 has not been complied by the respondent.

¶8

Learned counsel for the respondent states that an appeal has been filed before the Hon’ble Patna High Court. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the for the last more than six months have expired, the appeal is not proceeded further by the respondent and as of today, there is no stay of operation of the order dated 11^th January, 2019, therefore, the respondent is now to comply the order dated 11^th January, 2019. Counsel for the appellants states that despite of offering to deposit the use and occupation charges as per same order, the respondent is not ready to accept the same. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to comply the order within two weeks, otherwise adverse inference shall be drawn against the I.O.

¶9

In case the order is not complied in the absence of any stay order, the I.O. shall remain present before this Tribunal in the next date of hearing.

¶10

Issue notice in the contempt application for the next date. Reply be filed by the respondent within four weeks.

¶11

List on 26^th August, 2019.

¶12

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶13

New Delhi, 01^st July, 2019

¶14

‘AS’

¶15

FPA-PMLA-2439/PTN/2018, FPA-PMLA-2452-2453/PTN/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2456/PTN/2018

¶16

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 of Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-2452/PTN/2018 of Danik Lal Mandal @ Bhutali & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases