Listing order in three FPA/PMLA applications. Appellants absent; Respondent instructed to file written synopsis. Next hearing fixed.
This hearing order records the absence of counsel for appellants and directs the Respondent to file a written synopsis within the specified timeframe. The matter is listed for the next hearing on 14th January 2021. No substantive decision or disposals of the applications are made in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-2079/NGP/2017
Shri Ashok Kashiram Potbhare … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Nagpur … Respondent
2. FPA-PMLA-2080/NGP/2017 Shri Bhushan Thakurdas Vidyarthi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Nagpur … Respondent
3. FPA-PMLA-2105/NGP/2017 Naval Gokul Prasad Harsh … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Nagpur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate on behalf of Shri Naveen Kr. Matta, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
08.09.2020
FPA-PMLA-2079-2080/NGP/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2105/NGP/2017
None for the appellants. Shri Neeraj Atri on behalf of Shri N.K.
Matta, the learned counsel for the Respondent is present. Parties to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 14th January, 2021.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 08th September, 2020 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-2079-2080/NGP/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2105/NGP/2017
Page 1 of 1
Ashok Kashiram Potbhare
Bhushan Thakurdas Vidyarthi
Naval Gokul Prasad Harsh
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Nagpur
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
