This order by the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA lists two appeals but adjourns them to 18 January 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and suspension of tribunal functioning. Existing interim stays remain in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-3216/CHN/2017 (A.G.) FPA-PMLA-1632/CHN/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri S. P. Rajendran | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
| & | ||
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1638/CHN/2017 | ||
| Smt. R. Booma | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent (ED) | : None |
| CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 08.09.2020
FPA-PMLA-1632/CHN/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1638/CHN/2017
The matters are listed on 11th September, 2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notice dated 08.09.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020 & 02.09.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal
FPA-PMLA-1632/CHN/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1638/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 2
regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 18th January, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any,
already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-In-Charge
New Delhi,
08th September, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1632/CHN/2017
& FPA-PMLA-1638/CHN/2017
Page 2 of 2
S. P. Rajendran
R. Booma
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
