Appeals filed by multiple companies against the Enforcement Directorate were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of Money-Laundering Act for non-prosecution due to the absence of appellants and their counsel.
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-5742/KOL/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2941/KOL/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2851/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1510/KOL/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| M/s. Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2857/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1516/KOL/2016 |
|
| M/s. SPS Steels Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1924/KOL/2017 | |
| M/s. SPS Steels Rolling Mills Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| & | |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1925/KOL/2017 | |
| M/s. Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared | |
| For the Appellants : None |
|
| For the Respondent (ED) : Mr. Vikas Garg, |
Advocate |
| CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIR |
MAN |
FPA-PMLA-1510/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1516/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1924/KOL/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1925/KOL/2017
Page 1 of 2
ORDER 12.02.2020
FPA-PMLA-1510/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1516/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA -1924/KOL/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1925/KOL/2017
Shri Nitin Sangra, learned counsel who had filed Affidavit for these appellants submits that he has no instructions to appear in these matters. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent is pressing for dismissal of these appeals for non-prosecution. The aforesaid appellants are neither appearing for themselves nor any counsels is presented on their behalf.
Since nobody appears on behalf of the appellants, the appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 12th February, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1510/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1516/KOL/2016, FPA-PMLA-1924/KOL/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1925/KOL/2017
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether these appeals can proceed in absence of the appellants.
M/s. Bengal India Global Infrastructure Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
M/s. SPS Steels Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
M/s. SPS Steels Rolling Mills Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
