This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-2093/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Manoj Sethia | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2542/MUM/2016 (A.D.) | ||
| MP-PMLA-2089/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 |
||
| Manoj Sethia HUF | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-2543/MUM/2016 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-2090/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015 |
||
| Aman Sky Rise Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 07.04.2020
FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPAPMLA-1080/MUM/2015
In view of notice dated 26.03.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of work in Appellate Tribunal, the matter is adjourned to 18th September, 2020.
FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 2
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Ved Prakash Verma) Registrar
New Delhi, 26th March, 2020
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 2
Manoj Sethia
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manoj Sethia HUF
Aman Sky Rise Pvt. Ltd.
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
