The bench allowed the appellant four weeks to file written submissions in four connected money laundering appeals and ftpas, noting the request was granted as a last chance.
Appellant allowed four weeks to file written synopsis with advance copy served on the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3177/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1658/MUM/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Aman Sky Rise Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2093/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015 |
||
| Manoj Sethia | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-2542/MUM/2016 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-2089/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 |
||
| Manoj Sethia HUF | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| & | ||
| (4) MP-PMLA-2543/MUM/2016 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-2090/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015 |
||
| Aman Sky Rise Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : | Mr. Vineet S. Shrivastawa, Proxy counsel |
|---|---|---|
| On behalf of Mr. Aatreya Singh, Advocate | ||
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-1658/MUM/2017, FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 2
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
21.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-1658/MUM/2017, FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPAPMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015
Learned counsels for both the parties are present. The learned counsel for the appellants is seeking four weeks time to file the written synopsis which is strongly objected by the learned counsel for the respondent. Considered as a last chance, the appellant is allowed to file the written submissions within four weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
List on 07th April, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 21st November, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1658/MUM/2017, FPA-PMLA-1064/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1079/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-1080/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant four weeks time to the appellant to file the written synopsis.
Aman Sky Rise Pvt. Ltd.
Manoj Sethia
Manoj Sethia HUF
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
