Appeal regarding PMLA case listed for hearing. Registrar failed to appear. Respondent sought to verify filing dates and dispatch details before the Bench could determine timeliness
adjourned to 23rd July, 2019
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-996/PTN /2015
Madhu Koda … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 16.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-996/PTN /2015
On the last occasion the Registrar was directed to be present here.
However, no one appears. The learned counsel for the respondent states that they will seek instructions as to the cutting and re-writing of dates, dispatch details as in the last page of the impugned order to facilitate the Bench to take a view whether the appeal has been filed on time or not.
Adjourned to 23rd July, 2019.
(Ananya Ray)
Member
New Delhi, 16th May, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-996/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
whether the appeal was filed within the time limit or not.
Madhu Koda
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
