Appeal where appellant invoked the SBI/ED judgment of July 14, 2017 regarding mortgaged property. Respondent sought time for verification before any pronouncement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015
The Director, IFCI Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Counsel appeared For the respondent : Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 13.02.2019
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015
The learned counsel for the appellant states that the prayer in the present appeal is covered in the case of State Bank of India vs. Enforcement Directorate judgment dated 14th July, 2017. It is stated that the borrowers have mortgaged the property with the appellant. Mr. Mohd. Faraz learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify the same.
Re-notify on 17th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 13th February, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State Bank of India vs. Enforcement DirectorateReferred¶7
State Bank of India vs. Enforcement Directorate judgment dated 14th July, 2017
The Director, IFCI Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
