The tribunal listed the appeal for 12th April, 2018. The respondent sought an adjournment, which was granted pending counsel availability. The appellant stated no relief against respondent nos. 2 to 6 was sought.
Granted adjournment pending availability of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015
The Director, IFCI Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri S.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate Shri Lalit Vohra, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 18.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015
Brief synopsis has been filed by the appellant. Main counsel for the respondent is not available. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate appeared on behalf of the respondent and seeks an adjournment.
List this matter on 12th April, 2018.
We may clarify here that the appeal has also been filed against the respondent no. 2 to 6. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the appellant is not seeking any relief in the present appeal against the respondent no. 2 to 6. No further date will be given on the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 18th January, 2018 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-958/HYD/2015 Page 1 of 1
The Director, IFCI Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Justice Manmohan Singh
Shri G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
