Appeals before appellate tribunal were listed for argument. Court directed respondent to file reply within session and allows filing written synopsis. Adjourned for next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-1658/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-879/MUM/2015 |
||
|---|---|---|
| N.K. Industries Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3381/MUM/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1659/MUM/2015 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1585/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-829/MUM/2015 |
||
| N.K. Proteins Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3950/MUM/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1638/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-855/MUM/2015 |
||
| M/s. Banpal Oil Chem Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3088/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3089/MUM/2017 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-1617/MUM/2017 |
||
| Edelweiss Housing Finance Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-1748/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015 |
||
| Sonal Patel | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director |
FPA-PMLA-879, 829, 855/MUM/2015 FPA-PMLA-1617-MUM/2017 & FPA-PMLA-909, 910, 911 & 1029/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 3
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
|---|---|---|
| (6) MP-PMLA-3380/MUM/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1749/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-910/MUM/2015 |
||
| N.K. Proteins Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-1750/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-911/MUM/2015 |
||
| N.K. Industries Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (8) FPA-PMLA-1029/MUM/2015 | ||
| N.K. Industries Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Pragnesh M/ Gandhi, Advocate
| Shri Sahil Jaggi, Advocate Shri Rohit Mahajan, Advocate Shri Aditya Singla, Advocate |
|
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| ORDER |
|---|
| 04.07.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-879, 829, 855/MUM/2015, FPA-PMLA-1617-MUM/2017 & FPA-PMLA-909, 910, 911 & 1029/MUM/2015
Shri Rajeev Awasthi, the learned counsel for the respondent states
that replies are ready and he would be filing the same during the course
FPA-PMLA-879, 829, 855/MUM/2015 FPA-PMLA-1617-MUM/2017 & FPA-PMLA-909, 910, 911 & 1029/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 3
of the day. Copy has been handed over to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder with four weeks. Let the same be done within four weeks. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 30th October, 2019.
The respondent to file the copy of the prosecution complaint by the
next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 4th July, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-879, 829, 855/MUM/2015
Page 3 of 3
FPA-PMLA-1617-MUM/2017 & FPA-PMLA-909, 910, 911 & 1029/MUM/2015
N.K. Industries Ltd.
N.K. Proteins Ltd.
M/s. Banpal Oil Chem Pvt. Ltd.
Edelweiss Housing Finance Ltd.
Sonal Patel
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
