The appellate tribunal listed the appeal pending and directed parties to submit written synopses or prosecute complaints before consideration on a specified date. No substantive decision was recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1638/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-855/MUM/2015
M/s Banpal Oil Chem Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate Shri T. Sundar Ramanathan, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| 1 | ORDER 0.08.201 |
7 |
FPA-PMLA-855/MUM/2015
List this appeal for consideration on 25th October, 2017 before the Bench-1.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis. Mr. Saud, advocate for the respondent submits that instead of filing the written synopsis the copy of the prosecution complaint will file in which contains all the details.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 10th August, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-855/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Banpal Oil Chem Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
