The Appellate Tribunal listed several appeals filed against orders of the Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, for a date in July 2019 after noting that the respondent's counsel contended unpaid costs and the appellants were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-PMLA-392/LKW/2012 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hinish Ram Chandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-PMLA-393/LKW/2012 | ||
| Smt. Nandini Ram Chandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012 | ||
| M/s. SRS Developers | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012 | ||
| Shri Ashish Sewani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-PMLA-396/LKW/2012 | ||
| Smt. Preeti Sewani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (6) FPA-PMLA-397/LKW/2012 | ||
| SRS Laminators | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (7) FPA-PMLA-404/LKW/2012 | ||
| SRS Investment Co. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013
Page 1 of 2
| (8) FPA-PMLA-538/LKW/2013 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hinish Ramchandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (9) FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 | ||
| Nandani Ramchandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (10) FPA-PMLA-540/LKW/2013 | ||
| Preeti Sewani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
|
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN |
SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER | ||
| 1 | 1.03.2019 | |
| FPA-PMLA-392-397 540/LKW/2013 |
& | 404/LKW/2012, FPA-PMLA-538- |
The counsel for the respondent states that cost has not been paid. Let the same be paid within four weeks, (if already not paid). No one appears on behalf of the appellant.
List these appeals on 15th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman New Delhi, 11th March, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013
Page 2 of 2
Hinish Ram Chandhani
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Nandini Ram Chandhani
Smt. Preeti Sewani
M/s. SRS Developers
Shri Ashish Sewani
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
