The Tribunal listed the matter for a date when the appellant agreed to re-deposit cost if the previously submitted Demand Draft could not be encashed. No substantive order on merits was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012
Sh. Ashish Sewani … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Chakravaty Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
21.11.2017
FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that cost of Rs. 50,000/- has been deposited by way of Demand Draft in the Enforcement Directorate Zonal office, Lucknow. However, learned counsel for the respondent submits that cost was supposed to be deposited in the name of Pay & Account Office, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India.
Mr. Vikas Garg, counsel for the respondent as per his instruction submits that the Demand Draft deposited by the appellant could not be encashed. Mr. Vikas Garg, also states that the Zonal Office, Lucknow will return the Demand Draft which is not encashed within four weeks from today.
FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012
Page 1 of 2
In view of the facts, the appellant agreed that in case the said D.D. is not encashed, the appellant will prepare to deposit the same cost with the office suggested by the learned counsel for the respondent within four weeks from today.
List this matter on 10th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st November, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012
Page 2 of 2
Ashish Sewani
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
