Disposed

FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 of Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

ATFP15 Jan 2019FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal for Special Economic Offenses condoned the delay in filing fresh appeals filed by appellants under Section 26 of the PMLA. The respondent was granted six weeks to file a reply with status quo maintained regarding a specific property.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay accepted; six weeks time granted to respondent for reply; status quo maintained on second property; list dated April 9, 2019.

FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 of Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra v/s… — Narcotics (NDPS) | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-5463/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5464/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5465/AHD/2019 (Stay)

¶3

& FPA-PMLA-2794/AHD/2019 M/s. ABC Cotspin Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-5466/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5467/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5468/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra … Appellant

¶4

MP-PMLA-5479/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5470/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5471/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2796/AHD/2019 Shri Ashwin Ashok Patel … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellants : Shri Yuvraj G. Thakore, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 15.01.2019

¶7

FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019 & MP-PMLA-5463, 5466 & 5479/AHD/2019 (COD)

¶8

Appellant has filed the fresh appeals under Section 26 of Prevention of Money

¶9

Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 05^th November, 2018. Alongwith the

¶10

FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

appeals, the appellant has filed the application for condonation of delay. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. There is a small delay. The same is condoned.

¶13

Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be done within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.

¶14

In the meanwhile, status quo shall be maintained by both the parties with

¶15

regard to the second property. The detail of the second property is given below:

¶16

Sr. No.	Property name/description	Name of the owner	Date of Purchase	Value (in Rs.)
1.	C-3, Nikumbh Complex, Law Garden, Ahmedabad (Super built up Area of 995 Sq. Feet, Municipal Tenament number 0513-07-1236- 0001-C At	Mr. Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra	21.01.2008	Purchased for Rs. 18,00,000/- and market value during December, 2015 as per valuation report dated 20.03.2018-
	Changispur T.P.			Rs.
	Scheme No. 3, final plot No. 424 paiki, sub-plot No. 5 paiki)			54,72,500/-

¶17

List on 09^th April, 2019.

¶18

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶19

(G. C. Mishra) Member

¶20

New Delhi, 15^th January, 2019

¶21

‘A’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 of Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 of Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases