Coram fixed the hearing date for three appeals under the PMLA. Counsel were present, and time was granted for filing a rejoinder with an advance copy.
Time of four weeks granted for filing rejoinder; appeals listed for hearing on 13th April 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-5465/AHD/2019 (Stay) & |
|
|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-2794/AHD/2019 |
|
| M/s. ABC Cotspin Pvt. Ltd. | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-5468/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 |
|
| Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra | … Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-5471/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2796/AHD/2019 Shri Ashwin Ashok Patel |
… Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad |
… Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Bhushan Oza, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 20.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019
The learned counsel for both the parties are present. The replies are on record. The learned counsel for the appellant is seeking four weeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the other side.
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019
Page 1 of 2
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date of
hearing.
Interim order to continue.
List the appeals on 13th April, 2020
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 20th November, 2019 M
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019
Page 2 of 2
M/s. ABC Cotspin Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra
Shri Ashwin Ashok Patel
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
