FPA-PMLA-2756/DLI/2018 of Mr. Sundaresh Bhat v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Mr. Sundaresh Bhat V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-5659/DLI/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5658/DLI/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2910/DLI/2019 |
|
|---|---|
| M/s. Sterling SEZ & Infrastructure Ltd. … |
Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
|
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … |
Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-5460/DLI/2019 (Exem.) MP-PMLA-5661/DLI/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2792/DLI/2019 |
|
| M/s. PMT Machines Ltd. … |
Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
|
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … |
Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-5360/DLI/2019 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-5361/DLI/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2751/DLI/2018 |
|
| JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. … |
Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
|
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … |
Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-5855/DLI/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-5378/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2756/DLI/2018 |
|
| Mr. Sundaresh Bhat … |
Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
|
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who app | eared |
| For the Appellant : Shri Raje Samudra Shri Sate |
ndra Beniwal, Advocate Sarangi, Shruti Raina & ndra K. Rai, Advocates |
| For the Respondent : Shri S.K. |
Sharma, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-2910, 2792, 2751 & 2756/DLI/2019
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Sterling SEZ & Infrastructure Ltd.
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
- appellant
M/s. PMT Machines Ltd.
- appellant
Mr. Sundaresh Bhat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court