A one-paragraph order by the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, New Delhi, directing the registry to file department replies and allowing the appellants to file rejoinders before listing the petitions on 10th December 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-2557/MUM/2018 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sahil Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-2558/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sagar Surendra Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-2559/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sunny Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-2560/MUM/2018 | ||
| Praveen Kumar l |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-2561/MUM/2018 | ||
| Rosy Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-2562/MUM/2018 | ||
| Vishal Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Sahil Ramesh Nagpal, Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 15.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-2557-2562/MUM/2018
Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate states that replies have been received from the department and he would be filing the same in the registry. Let same be done with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 10th December, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 15th July, 2019.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2557 to 2562/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 1
Sahil Ramesh Nagpal
Sagar Surendra Nagpal
Sunny Ramesh Nagpal
Praveen Kumar
Rosy Nagpal
Vishal Ramesh Nagpal
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
