The Appellate Tribunal granted time to the respondent to file a reply to the notice dated 01st March, 2018, within six weeks. A rejoinder was allowed within four weeks. Adjourned for 14th January, 2019.
Time to file reply granted within six weeks; rejoinder allowed within four weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-2557/MUM/2018 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sahil Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … |
Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-2558/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sagar Surendra Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-2559/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sunny Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-2560/MUM/2018 | ||
| Praveen Kumar | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-2561/MUM/2018 | ||
| Rosy Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-2562/MUM/2018 | ||
| Vishal Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
| & | ||
| 7. FPA-PMLA-2235/MUM/2018 | ||
| Mr. Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-2557-2562/MUM/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2235/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 2
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Yadav P. R., Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 15.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-2557-2562/MUM/2018 & FPA-PMLA-2235/MUM/2018
The above mentioned appeals have been filed against the order dated 01st March, 2018. Issue notice. Mr. Rajeev Awasthi accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 14th January, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 15th October, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2557-2562/MUM/2018
& FPA-PMLA-2235/MUM/2018
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an adjournment should be granted to the respondent to file the reply to the notice.
Sahil Ramesh Nagpal
Sagar Surendra Nagpal
Sunny Ramesh Nagpal
Praveen Kumar
Rosy Nagpal
Vishal Ramesh Nagpal
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
