The Appellant/ applicant was granted time to file a rejoinder within four weeks. The matter was listed for a future date.
The tribunal permitted the appellant to file a rejoinder to the reply within a four-week period. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5105/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4917/MUM/2018 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-4918/MUM/2018 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-2532/MUM/2018 Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Manish Jha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2532/MUM/2018
Reply has been filed. Counsel for the appellant seeks time to the
rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 18th March, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 14th January, 2019
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-2532/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 1
Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
