Direction to trace a pending reply filed by the respondent. Ultimately, the appellant is given a deadline for a rejoinder or the interim order stands vacated. List fixed for February 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4716/JP/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-4715/JP/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2437/JP/2018
Sh. K. Jacob John & Anr.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 11.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-2437/JP/2018
None for the appellant. Mr. Atul Tripathi, ld. counsel for the respondent submits that reply has been filed in the registry long back. The same is not on record. The Registry is directed to trace out the same and place it on record. If the same is not traceable, the respondent will provide the same within one week.
One last opportunity is granted to the appellant to file the rejoinder by the next date, if the same is not filed the interim order is likely to be vacated.
List on 26th February, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 11th December, 2019 ‘s ’
FPA-PMLA-2437/JP/2018
Page 1 of 1
K. Jacob John & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
