Appellant declined to file rejoinder; matter listed for future hearing and synopsis submission. No substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4595/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2369/CHN/2018
Rose Arakkel … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai …
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant no : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vineesh Kedavam, Adv. For the respondent : Shri Atul Kumar Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 29.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-2369/CHN/2018
Ld. counsel for the appellant states that he does not want to file the rejoinder.
List on 6th January, 2020. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis be filed by the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 29th July, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-2369/CHN/2018
Page 1 of 1
Rose Arakkel
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
