The bench listed three appeals filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It noted a delay in filing some appeals which was condoned. An order was made adjourning the trial for listing on a specific date and fixing a timeline for replying and rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-4583/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2361/CHN/2018 |
|
|---|---|
| M/s Aalians Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … |
Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-4591/CHN/2018 (U.A.) FPA-PMLA-4592/CHN/2018 Stay MP-PMLA-4593/CHN/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2368/CHN/2018 |
|
| Francis Chakkalamattom Peter … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … |
Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-4594/CHN/2018 (U.A.) FPA-PMLA-4595/CHN/2018 Stay MP-PMLA-4596/CHN/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2369/CHN/2018 |
|
| Rose Arakkel … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared |
|
| For the appellant no.1 : Ms. Richa Narain |
|
| For the appellant no. 2 & 3 : Sh. Ashutosh Ku Vineesh Kedaram |
mar & Sh. , Advocates |
| For the respondent : Shri Atul Kumar Advocate |
Tripathi, |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN |
|
| FPA-PMLA-2361/2368 & 2369/CHN/2018 | Page 1 of 2 |
ORDER 09.07.2018
FPA-PMLA-2361/CHN/2018, MP-PMLA-4593/CHN/2018 (COD) in FPAPMLA-2368/CHN/2018, MP-PMLA-4596/CHN/2018 (COD) in FPAPMLA-2369/CHN/2018
The above mentioned-appeal has been filed u/s 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. There is a small delay in filing the appeal no. FPA-PMLA-2368 & 2369/CHN/2018 which is not opposed. The delay is condoned. The M.P. is accordingly disposed of.
Shri Atul Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 1st October, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 9th July, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-2361/2368 & 2369/CHN/2018
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay was permitted for filing the appeal under FEMA/PMLA.
Procedure to be followed for the filing of reply and rejoinder.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aalians Consultants India Pvt. Ltd.
Francis Chakkalamattom Peter
Rose Arakkel
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
