List order granting time to file rejoinder and written synopsis; listing fixed for April 8, 2020.
Four weeks time granted to file rejoinder; further time to file written synopsis allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5970/HYD/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4188/HYD/2017 (Exem.) &
FPA-PMLA-2136/HYD/2017
The Bombay Mercantile Co-operative … Appellant Bank Ltd.
Versus
The Director, Financial Intelligence Unit, Hyderabad … Respondent
| Advocates/Authorized Rep | resentatives who appeared |
|---|---|
| For the Appellant | : Mr. V. K. Mittal, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Vineet Sharma, Advocate |
| On behalf of Mr. Satish Agaarwala, Advocate |
|
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 19.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-2136/HYD/2017
Mr. Vineet Sharma, appearing for Mr. Satish Aggarwala, main counsel for the respondent is present and he is seeking time on the ground that the main counsel is indisposed of. It is seen from the record that the appellant was directed to file the rejoinder, the same has not been filed. The appellant is seeking four weeks time to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks as a last chance, with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
On the last date, both parties were allowed to file the written synopsis. The same has not been filed.
FPA-PMLA-2136/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 2
Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 08th April, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 19th November, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2136/HYD/2017
Page 2 of 2
Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Director, Financial Intelligence Unit, Hyderabad
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
