Dismissed

FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017 of M/s Navoday Consultants Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP10 Jan 2019FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal heard appeals seeking quashing of looking out notices. The Court held it lacked jurisdiction to quash the notice based on liability clearing. Appellants were directed to file applications before the Special Court.

What did the court decide?

No quashing of looking out notice ordered; appellants directed to proceed before Special Court.

FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017 of M/s Navoday Consultants Ltd. v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3992/ DLI /2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3993/DLI/2017 (Exm.) &FPA-PMLA-2063/ DLI /2017 M/s Mita Holdings Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-3994/ DLI /2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3995/DLI/2017 (Exm.) &FPA-PMLA-2064/ DLI /2017 M/s Dankuni Investment Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-4009/DLI/2017 Stay MP-PMLA-4010/DLI/2017 Exm. FPA-PMLA-2068/DLI/2017 M/s Global Steel Holdings Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-4011/DLI/2017 Stay MP-PMLA-4012/DLI/2017 Exm. FPA-PMLA-2069/DLI/2017 M/s Balasore Alloys Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-4013/DLI/2017 Stay MP-PMLA-4014/DLI/2017 Exm. FPA-PMLA-2070/DLI/2017 M/s Navadisha Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-4015/DLI/2017 Stay MP-PMLA-4016/DLI/2017 Exm. FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017 M/s Navoday Consultants Ltd … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellants	: Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocate Mr. Gautammitra, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Bagle, Advocate Ms. Deepali Dewedi, Advocate
For the Respondent	: Mohd. Faraz, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G. C. MISHRA	: MEMBER

¶5

ORDER

¶6

10.01.2019

¶7

FPA-PMLA-2063-2064, 2068-2071/DLI/2017

¶8

Counsel for the appellant has placed the copy of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 6^th December, 2018. We have gone through the judgment passed by the Supreme Court.

¶9

FPA-PMLA-2063-2064, 2068-2071/DLI/2017

¶10

Page 1 of 2

¶11

List on 7^th March, 2019.

¶12

Counsel for the appellant states that in order to clearing his all liabilities (as observed by the Supreme Court) look out notice be quashed. We have no jurisdiction in this regard. In case the appellant wishes to file any application before the Special Court, let him proceeds in accordance with law.

¶13

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶14

(G. C. Mishra) Member

¶15

New Delhi, 10^th January, 2019

¶16

‘K’

¶17

FPA-PMLA-2063-2064, 2068-2071/DLI/2017

¶18

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017 of M/s Navoday Consultants Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-2071/DLI/2017 of M/s Navoday Consultants Ltd. v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases