Listed for remaining arguments regarding provisional attachment orders filed in PMLA matters. Required documents such as reasons to believe have not been received by the Adjudicating Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3875/GOA/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1975/GOA/2017
Churchill Alemao & Anr.
… Appellant
2. MP-PMLA-3876/GOA/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1976/GOA/2017
Shri Digambar Kamat & Anr
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant no. 1 | : Shri P.K. Dey, Advocate Ms.Shreyashi Chakrabarty, Adv |
|---|---|
| For the appellant no. 2 | : Shri Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Shri Anupama, Ninad, Advocates Mr. Gurmehar R. Sistani, Adv Mr. Ivo D’costa, Advocate |
| For the respondent | : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 14.01.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-1975 & 1976/GOA/2017
File from the office of the Adjudicating Authority has not received. Copy of the reasons to believe has not been produced. Mr. Vikas Garg, Counsel for the respondent submits that before passing of the provisional attachment order, no separate reasons to believe order is to be passed as P.A.O. order already He states that P.A.O. contains the reasons to believe.
Matter is partly argued on behalf of both the parties.
List for remaining arguments on 29th June, 2019 at 2:30.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 14th January, 2019
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1975 & 1976/GOA/2017
Page 1 of 1
Churchill Alemao & Anr
Shri Digambar Kamat & Anr
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Goa
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
