The Appellant failed to appear. The Respondent's proxy counsel submitted non-availability of main counsel. The order adjourned the proceeding and did not decide the merits. It was a recording of appearances at an appearance-only hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3846/DLI/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1953/DLI/2017
Shiv Murat Dwivedi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the Appellant : Mr. Chirag Advocate Mr. Ajay Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Proxy for Ms. Shilpi S. Satyam, Adv. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 16.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-1953/DLI/2017
Ld. counsel for the respondent is not present. Mr. Neeraj Atri, proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the respondent and submits that main counsel is not available who will argue the matter.
Re-notify on 5th December, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 16th July, 2019 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1953/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shiv Murat Dwivedi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
