The Tribunal adjourned proceedings due to the non-availability of the main counsel. Time was granted for filing the rejoinder and parties were directed to submit written synopses.
Grant of four weeks time to file rejoinder and direction to file written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-PMLA-1881/LKW/2017 Sh. Jambu Prasad Jain |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-PMLA-1882/LKW/2017 | ||
| Smt. Reetu Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 | ||
| Smt. Swati Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-PMLA-1884/LKW/2017 | ||
| Sh. Sanjay Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-6192/LKW/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3801/LKW/2017 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-3704/LKW/2017 (stay) FPA-PMLA-1885/LKW/2017 |
||
| M/s JSP Projects Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (6) FPA-PMLA-1886/LKW/2017 | ||
| Sh. Pankaj Jain | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017 The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Page 1 of 2 Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rohit Tomar, proxy counsel for Shri Manish Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, SPP Shri A.R. Aditya, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 16.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017
Shri Rohit Tomar, proxy counsel appearing for the main counsel Shri Manish Gupta, for the appellant is seeking adjournment on the ground that main counsel is not available. It is seen from the order dated 17th July, 2019 that the appellant was directed to file the rejoinder. Rejoinder is not on record. On request four weeks time is granted to the appellant to file the same. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side. Parties are also directed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 18th May, 2020.
Interim order to continue.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 16th December, 2019.
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017
Page 2 of 2
Jambu Prasad Jain
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Reetu Jain
Swati Jain
Sanjay Jain
M/s JSP Projects Pvt. Ltd.
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
