Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 of Smt. Swati Jain v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

ATFP28 Nov 2018FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal deferred the disposal of six foreign currency transfers appeals (FPA-PMLA-1881/1886/LKW/2017). The Tribunal mandated the production of FIR, charge-sheet, and records from the ED and Adjudicating Authority before scheduling the next hearing for March 2019 and issued an interim order to continue.

What did the court decide?

Adjourned; interim order passed to continue the stay/order pending further directions.

FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 of Smt. Swati Jain v/s The Joint Director… — Insurance | ATFP (2018)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) MP-PMLA-3801/LKW/2017 (u/s 35) MP-PMLA-3704/LKW/2017 (stay) FPA-PMLA-1885/LKW/2017

¶3

M/s JSP Projects Pvt. Ltd.	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(2) FPA-PMLA-1881/LKW/2017
Sh. Jambu Prasad Jain Versus	…	Appellant
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(3) FPA-PMLA-1882/LKW/2017
Smt. Reetu Jain	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(4) FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017
Smt. Swati Jain	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(5) FPA-PMLA-1884/LKW/2017
Sh. Sanjay Jain	…	Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent

¶4

FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017

¶5

Page 1 of 3

¶6

(6) FPA-PMLA-1886/LKW/2017

¶7

Sh. Pankaj Jain … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent

¶8

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶9

For the appellant : Shri Manish Gupta, Advocate Shri Rohit Tomar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate

¶10

CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER

¶11

ORDER 28.11.2018

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017

¶13

Mr. Rana, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has verified the position from the office of ED who states that no contrary report is available on record. As far as contrary to the report of IIT, if any is concerned, Mr. Rana is not aware about the same. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the counsel appearing before the CBI Court has made the statement that no such report is available in the application under section 91 of Cr.P.C.

¶14

Under these circumstances, we are of the view that the appeal is to be decided on merit. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date. The respondent shall produce the following documents:-

¶15

(i) Copy of FIR

¶16

(ii) Copy of Charge-sheet

¶17

(iii) Copy of the prosecution complaint

¶18

(iv) Original record from the office of ED containing the reasons to

¶19

believe.

¶20

FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017

¶21

Page 2 of 3

¶22

The entire record from the office of Adjudicating Authority shall also

¶23

be summoned by the next date.

¶24

List on 6^th March, 2019.

¶25

Interim order to continue.

¶26

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶27

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶28

New Delhi, 28^th November, 2018

¶29

‘D’

¶30

FPA-PMLA-1881-1886/LKW/2017

¶31

Page 3 of 3

FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 of Smt. Swati Jain v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1883/LKW/2017 of Smt. Swati Jain v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases