The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for arguments on 12 April 2019. The appellant claimed no complaint was filed within the 90-day limit. The respondent sought time to for instructions. The order is an interim procedural direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
Tilak Raj Arora … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Shri Harish Kohli, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER
19.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
The counsel on behalf of the appellant says that no prosecution complaint has been filed by the appellant within prescribed period of 90 days. Mr. Matta, seeks 15 days time to take the instructions in this regard.
List on 12th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 19th March, 2019 ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant filed a prosecution complaint within the prescribed period of 90 days.
Tilak Raj Arora
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
