This order did not dispose of the appeal. It recorded receipt of the appellant's reply, allowed time to file a rejoinder, and permitted filing of written synopses. The matter was listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
Tilak Raj Arora … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Harish Kohli, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. N. K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 05.10.2018
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
Copy of the reply has handedover to the counsel for the appellant
who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be done within four weeks. Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis.
List on 7th December, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
5th October, 2018
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1875/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Tilak Raj Arora
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
