FPA-PMLA-1839/CHN/2017 of J. Arul v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
J. Arul V/s The Deputy Director Directorate…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-3609/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1839/CHN/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| J. Arul | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3611/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1840/CHN/2017 |
||
| S. Nirmala | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3613/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1841/CHN/2017 |
||
| Smt. S. Kumari | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-3615/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1842/CHN/2017 |
||
| D. Senthil | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 22.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-1839-1842/CHN/2017
Replies and rejoinders are not on record. It is submitted by the ld. Counsel for the respondent that he is yet to receive the copy of the rejoinder. Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Advocate for appellants agrees to supply the same within one week. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 31st March, 2020.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
J. Arul, S. Nirmala, Smt. S. Kumari, D. Senthil
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1839/CHN/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court