FPA-PMLA-1782/DLI/2017 of Gagandeep Singh Sehgal v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1782/DLI/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listing order by the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA fixing next hearing date. Present offer short
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. MP-PMLA-3541/DLI/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3483/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1782/DLI/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Gagandeep Singh Sehgal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3542/DLI/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3484/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1783/DLI/2017 |
||
| Gagandeep Impex Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-3543/DLI/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3485/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1784/DLI/2017 |
||
| Universal Holding Company | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2959/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1563/DLI/2016 |
||
| Manmohan Singh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-2960/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1564/DLI/2016 |
||
| Gagandeep Singh Impex Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 6. MP-PMLA-2961/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1565/DLI/2016 |
||
| Gagandeep Singh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 7. FPA-PMLA-1570/DLI/2016 | ||
| M/s. Bharat Communication | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| & | ||
| 8. FPA-PMLA-1571/DLI/2016 | ||
| Bharat Goyal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the Appellant Nos. 1-6 | : Mr. Faraz Khan, Advocate Ms. Aakriti Mathur, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Appellant Nos. 7 & 8 | : Mr. Rajeev Sinha, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Gagandeep Singh Sehgal etc.
- respondent
Jagtiren Singh (Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi)
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · January
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1782/DLI/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court