Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP10 Dec 2019FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act ordered contesting respondents to file a written synopsis with an advance copy served on the other side and directed the appellant to supply copies of its synopsis. The matter was listed for further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Contesting respondents directed to file written synopsis. Appellant directed to supply copies of synopsis filed.

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3376/CHN/2017 (Stay) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶4

Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. … Appellants

¶5

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the Appellant	:	Mr. P.R. Kovilan, Advocate
		Mr. V. Vasudevan, Advocate
For the Respondent no.1(ED)	:	Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate
For the Respondent no. 2	:	Mr. Harshit Chopra, Advocate
		Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate

¶8

CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶9

ORDER

¶10

10.12.2019

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶12

Learned counsels for both the parties are present. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that the respondent no(s). 3 to 8 have already been served and proof of service has been filed before the Appellate Tribunal. There is nothing on record to show that the appellant has filed the proof of service in the Appellate Tribunal.

¶13

It is further contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that those respondents are only performa respondents and no relief has been claimed by them.

¶14

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

The contesting respondents no. 1 & 2 are directed to file the written synopsis by the next date with an advance copy to be served on the other side.

¶17

The appellant has already filed the written synopsis and is directed to supply the copies of the written synopsis to the respondent no(s).1 & 2.

¶18

List on 06^th May, 2020.

¶19

(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶20

New Delhi, 10^th December, 2019

¶21

‘AS’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases