Partly allowed

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

ATFP20 Jul 2017FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal, specialised in PMLA matters, considered two applications (stay and file reply). It allowed the prayer regarding the stay application subject to costs, while granting time for filing the reply in the other application and listing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Prayer allowed subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- costs; six weeks time granted for filing reply.

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3376/CHN/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3377/CHN/2017 (COD) &

¶3

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶4

Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. … Appellant/Applicant

¶5

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the Appellant	:	Mr. P. R. Kovilan, Advocate Ms. Hemalatha, Advocate
For the Respondent No. 2	:	Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

¶8

ORDER

¶9

20.07.2017

¶10

MP-PMLA-3377/CHN/2017 (COD)

¶11

No reply has been filed, reasons for the same is given. We have gone through the content of the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is allowed subject to the cost of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) which shall be paid by the appellant to the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1.

¶12

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶13

Mr. Pankaj Vivek, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2. No one appears on behalf of respondent no. 1. The appellant will take the necessary steps to serve the respondent nos. 3 to 8. In the meanwhile, the respondent no. 1 & 2 are granted six weeks time to file the

¶14

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

reply with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who

¶17

may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶18

List on 07^th December, 2017.

¶19

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶20

(Anand Kishore)

¶21

Member

¶22

New Delhi, 20^th July, 2017

¶23

‘AS’

¶24

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1745/CHN/2017 of Srimathi S. Sarumathi & Anr. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases