This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3331/MUM/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017
Pratibha R. Kadam
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Anand Landge, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 06.08.2019
FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017
Reply has not been filed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant is agreeable to serve another copy of the paper-book within one week. After the receipt of the copy of the paper-book, the respondent is granted six weeks to file the reply with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 16th January, 2020.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 06th August, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Pratibha R. Kadam
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
