A monetary-resolution application where the respondent admitted recent engagement and requested an eight-week extension to file a reply. The matter was listed for August 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3331/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3332/MUM/2017 (COD) &
FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017 Pratibha R. Kadam … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Counsel appeared For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 19.01.2018
FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017
Reply has not been filed. Mr. Neeraj Atri learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has been engaged very recently in the matter. Therefore, reply could not be filed. He also needed to reconstruct the file. Let the reply be filed within eight weeks.
List on 10th August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member New Delhi, 19th January, 2018 ‘A’ FPA-PMLA-1717/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 1
Pratibha R. Kadam
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANANYA RAY
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
