Appeals against attachment orders under PMLA, where appellants failed to file written synopses. Court granted one more opportunity and directed maintenance of status quo regarding attached properties till next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3301/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1710/BNG/2017
H. M. Maltesh … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
2. MP-PMLA-3320/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1715/BNG/2017 Rajani Mal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
3. MP-PMLA-3379/BNG/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1746/BNG/2017
K. S. Nandini … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Senior Advocate Mr. Rakesh Gosain, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Dipanshu, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 09.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-1710, 1715 & 1746/BNG/2017
Parties have not filed the written synopsis. One more opportunity
is granted to them to file the same. Both the parties shall maintain the
status quo with regard to the attached properties till the next date of hearing.
List on 03rd April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 09th January, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1710, 1715 & 1746/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
H. M. Maltesh
Rajani Mal
K. S. Nandini
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
MANMOHAN SINGH
SHRI G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
