The Appellate Tribunal listed stay petitions for money laundering proceedings in enforcement cases, allowed written synopses, continued the interim order, and granted an adjournment pending counsel's availability.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3247/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1685/CHN/2017 Smt. S. Kumari … Appellant/Applicant 2. MP-PMLA-3249/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1686/CHN/2017 D. Senthil … Appellant/Applicant 3. MP-PMLA-3251/CHN/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1687/CHN/2017 Ms. Dhanalakshmi Sridhar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 08.07.2019 FPA-PMLA-1685 to 1687/CHN/2017
Counsel for the appellant is busy in the High Court and made a
request for adjournment.
List on 18th November, 2019.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 8th July, 2019
S
FPA-PMLA-1685 to 1687/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
S. Kumari
D. Senthil
Ms. Dhanalakshmi Sridhar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
