The Tribunal listed the appeal regarding the PMLA application on 19th December, 2017. It directed that the interim order stay application be continued and recorded replies filed by parties were taken on record.
Continue interim stay order; record replies; list for next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3247/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1685/CHN/2017
Smt. S. Kumari … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
31.07.2017
MP-PMLA-3247/CHN/2017 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1685/CHN/2017
Learned counsel for the respondent has filed the reply to the appeal and stay application, who has also filed the additional reply in view of the affidavit filed by the appellant. The same are taken on record. Rejoinder if any be filed on or before the next date.
List on 19th December, 2017. Interim order be continue.
Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti ’ to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 31st July, 2017
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1685/CHN/2017
Page 1 of 1
S. Kumari
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
