The Tribunal granted the appellants four weeks to file rejoinders and allowed the respondent to file replies in the interim application regarding pending fights under the PMLA.
Appellants allowed four weeks to file rejoinders; Respondent allowed to file replies in interim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3159/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3160/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1650/HYD/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Saloni Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3161/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3162/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1651/HYD/2017 |
||
| Ms. Suhani Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3170/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3171/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1652/HYD/2017 |
||
| Sheetal Refineries Limited | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3172/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3173/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017 |
||
| Sri Tirupathi Balaji Oils | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017 | Page 1 of 3 |
| (5) MP-PMLA-3174/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3175/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1654/HYD/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Jitender Kumar Agarwal | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017 |
|
| Jugal Kishore Agarwal | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3197/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3198/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1672/HYD/2017 |
|
| Nidhi Agencies | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : None For the respondent : Ms. Sanjana proxy Counsel for Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 02.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017
Replies have been filed on behalf of the respondent. One final
opportunity to the appellant to file the rejoinders within four weeks.
FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017
Page 2 of 3
List on 8th August, 2019.
In the meanwhile, the respondent is also allowed to file the replies in
the interim application.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
New Delhi, 2nd May, 2019
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellants are granted an extension to file rejoinders and whether the respondent is permitted to file interim replies.
Saloni Agarwal et al
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
