Appeal regarding money laundering proceedings. Reply not filed; respondent granted final opportunity to file reply within four weeks. Matter listed for next hearing.
In money laundering appeal where reply was not filed, appellate tribunal granted respondent one final opportunity to file reply within four weeks, allowing appellant to file rejoinder thereafter. Matter listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3174/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3175/HYD/2017 (A.D.) &
FPA-PMLA-1654/HYD/2017
Jitender Kumar Agarwal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri P. Prasad, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.05.2017
MP-PMLA-3174/HYD/2017 (Stay), MP-PMLA-3175/HYD/2017 (A.D.) & FPA-PMLA-1654/HYD/2017
Reply has not been filed till date. One final opportunity is given to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned Counsel for the Appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List the matter on 20th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th May, 2017 M
FPA-PMLA-1654/HYD/2017
Page 1 of 1
Jitender Kumar Agarwal
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
