FPA-PMLA-1541/CHN/2016 of N. Venkatraman v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
N. Venkatraman V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-2970/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1569/CHN/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| N. Kavitha |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2964/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1541/CHN/2016 |
||
| N. Venkatraman |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant |
: Shri I.V. Kasyap, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Mohd. Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
| 0 | ORDER 7.08.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-1569, 1541/CHN/2016
On the last date of hearing, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent made a statement that the physical possession of the property has already been taken. However, Counsel for the appellant was not aware. The position remains the same when the matter is taken up today. The new Counsel is not aware whether the physical possession is taken or not. The Counsel for the respondent is not available to argue the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N. Kavitha
- appellant
N. Venkatraman
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court