A single-paragraph order from the Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act recording representation regarding service of respondents on respondents no. 2 to 6 and extending time for filing a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2964/CHN/2016 (Stay) MP-PMLA-2888/CHN/2016 (COD) &
FPA-PMLA-1541/CHN/2016
N. Venkataraman … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri N. Rajaram, Advocate For the respondent : None
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 21.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1541/CHN/2016
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Respondent no. 2 to 6 are served. He would be filing the affidavit alongwith proof to show that they are served. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 10th October, 2017.
In the meanwhile, further four weeks time is granted to the
appellant to file the rejoinder.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 21st July, 2017 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1541/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 1
N. Venkataraman
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
MANMOHAN SINGH
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
