The Tribunal, noting counsel's request for additional time regarding the limitation period for prosecution complaints in multiple money laundering cases, adjourned proceedings to May 20th, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 Santiagu Martin |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Sh. Jose Daison | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1534/COCHIN/2016 Sh. S. Ravi |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1536/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Charles Realators Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016 Diason Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1538/COCHIN/2016 Martin Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Advocate Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 01.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-1529-1538/COCHIN/2016
Mr. N.K. Matta, Advocate has made his submissions for some time.
He seeks some more time to address the argument on the issue raised by
the senior counsel on behalf of the appellants to the effect that
FPA-PMLA-1529-1538/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 2
prosecution complaint has not been filed within the prescribed period of time.
List for remaining argument on 20th May, 2019 at 2:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi,
1st May, 2019
‘K’
FPA-ND-113/DLI/2017
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether prosecution complaint was filed within the prescribed period of time.
Whether appellants are entitled to further time for arguments on limitation.
Santiagu Martin et al.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
