This order grants an adjournment in a PMLA appeal due to the appellant's counsel's personal difficulty, lists the matter for final disposal, and allows the filing of written synopses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016
Diason Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Manan Shukla, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 11.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel is in personal difficulty and seeks an adjournment. The request is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent.
List the appeal for final disposal on 29th August, 2017.
As desired, both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis
on or before the next date.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 11th April, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016 Page 1 of 1
Diason Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
