A list of six appeals under the PMLA Act was part-heard. The respondent's representative was unavailable, leading to a request for adjournment granted till 12th September 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Santiagu Martin | … | Appellant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Shri Jose Daison | … | Appellant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1534/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Shri S. Ravi | … | Appellant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-1536/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Charles Realtors Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Diason Luxury Villas Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 7. FPA-PMLA-1538/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Martin Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Counsel appeared For the respondent : Counsel appeared on behalf of Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 09.09.2019
FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1533-1538/COCHIN/2016
It is a part heard matter. Mr. N.K. Matta, learned counsel for the
respondent is not available. Request for adjournment is made.
Re-notify on 12th September, 2019 at 2:30 PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 09th September, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016
FPA-PMLA-1533-1538/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Santiagu Martin
Shri Jose Daison
Shri S. Ravi
Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd.
Charles Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
Diason Luxury Villas Pvt. Ltd.
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
