An order listing six consolidated filing points, Petitions Against Money Laundering, for re-notification on 08.04.2019. The order does not decide the merits of the cases or grant any relief. It serves as an administrative procedural step.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Santiago Martin | … | Appellant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Shri Jose Daison | … | Appellant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1534/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Shri S. Ravi | … | Appellant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1535/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-1536/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Charles Realtors Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-1537/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Daison Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 7. FPA-PMLA-1538/COCHIN/2016 | ||
| Martin Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocate Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 08.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1533-1538/COCHIN/2016
At the request of the respondent, re-notify on 15th April, 2019 at
02:30PM.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 08th April, 2019 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1529/COCHIN/2016
& FPA-PMLA-1533-1538/COCHIN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Santiago Martin
Jose Daison
S. Ravi
Daison Land and Development Pvt. Ltd.
Charles Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
Daison Luzury Villas Pvt. Ltd.
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
