FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016 of Jose Daison v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Case brief
What is this about?
Jose Daison V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016
Jose Daison … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate With Shri Rishi Agarwal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 20.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016
Learned counsel for the appellant states that respondent no.2. may be deleted in the appeal. Amended memo of parties be filed within two weeks.
Appellant has filed the appeal under section 26 of the PMA Act - 2002 against the order dated 22nd September, 2016. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. N.K. Matta, Advocate accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jose Daison
- respondent
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Cochin
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1533/COCHIN/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court