Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016 of Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP24 May 2019FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge Bench of the Appellate Tribunal for FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT Act treated multiple appeals on an urgent basis due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and lack of convenient appearance by the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Listed for hearing prioritized on 03rd July, 2019; Investigating Officer directed to remain present.

FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016 of Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi — ATFP (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

FPA-PMLA-1332/DLI/2016 Naresh Jain … Appellant FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016 Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-3810/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3812/DLI/2017 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-1929/DLI/2017 Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellants : Shri Anirudh Sharma, Advocate Shri Abaid Parekh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Siddharth Chakravorty, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate For the respondent No. 2 : Shri A.N. Tiwari, Advocate MP-PMLA-3813/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3815/DLI/2017 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-1930/DLI/2017 Ms. Smeta Mangal Former Director … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi & Anr. … Respondents Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellant : Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocate For the respondents : Shri Siddharth Chakravorty, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate FPA-PMLA-1332 & 1333/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-1952 & 1957/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018 Page 1 of 4

¶3

MP-PMLA-3816/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3818/DLI/2017 (Exem.)

¶4

¶5

FPA-PMLA-1931/DLI/2017

¶6

Ravi Krishna

¶7

… Appellant

¶8

Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi & Anr. … Respondents

¶9

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶10

For the appellant	: Shri Girish Kumar, Advocate
For the respondents	: Shri Siddharth Sangal, Advocate Ms. Nilanjani Tandon, Advocate
For the respondent No. 2	: Shri A.N. Tiwari, Advocate

¶11

MP-PMLA-3837/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3838/DLI/2017 (Exem.) & FPA-PMLA-1952/DLI/2017 State Bank of India … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶12

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared For the appellant : Shri Siddharth Sangal, Advocate Ms. Nilanjani Tandon, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Siddharth Chakravorty, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate FPA-PMLA-1957/DLI/2017 Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent FPA-PMLA-1332 & 1333/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-1952 & 1957/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018 Page 2 of 4

¶13

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶14

For the appellant : Shri A.N. Tiwari, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Siddharth Chakravorty, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate MP-PMLA-4690/DLI/2018 (A.E.) MP-PMLA-4692/DLI/2018 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018 State Bank of Patiala … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶15

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶16

For the appellant	: Counsel appeared
For the respondent	: Shri Siddharth Chakravorty, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER

¶17

ORDER 24.05.2019

¶18

FPA-PMLA-1332, 1333/DLI/2016, FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017, FPAPMLA-1952, 1957/DLI/2017 & FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018

¶19

Matter is kept for respondent argument. Learned counsel is not present. A letter was circulated by the counsel on 23^rd May, 2019 stating that she is not keeping fit and the matter be adjourned for two weeks. Learned counsel for the appellant states that at least I.O. should have been present alongwith the record. He states that his client is suffering from great hardship. Therefore these appeals be taken up on an urgent basis. The

¶20

matter has already been argued on behalf of the appellant.

¶21

FPA-PMLA-1332 & 1333/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-1952 & 1957/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018

¶22

Page 3 of 4

¶23

In the interest of justice, list these appeals on 03^rd July, 2019.

¶24

No further adjournments will be granted for the said purposes.

¶25

Interim order to continue.

¶26

I.O. shall remain present alongwith the records on the next date of

¶27

hearing.

¶28

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶29

(G.C. Mishra) Member

New Delhi,

24^th May, 2019

‘A’

FPA-PMLA-1332 & 1333/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1929-1931/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-1952 & 1957/DLI/2017 FPA-PMLA-2428/DLI/2018

¶34

Page 4 of 4

FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016 of Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1333/DLI/2016 of Ziqitza Health Care Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases